peermind

For university academics

Good workhas company.

For the work behind academic work.

Tools for teaching, research, and the work between them. With academic judgment at the centre.

At an academic’s desk

Illustrative workflows
Explore a part of the work

A research-methods assessment

Does the study support a causal conclusion?

  • EvidenceExamine the study design
  • ReasoningDistinguish causation and correlation
  • FeedbackMake the limitations explicit

The proposal informs.
The instructor decides.

Working through the literature

What does this source help us understand?

  1. The paperKeep the source in view
  2. Related workTrace evidence-based connections
  3. Your research questionConnect reading with the project

A source becomes part of a conversation.

Considering academic credit transfer

How does prior learning meet a new programme?

Prior study

Course scope
Learning outcomes
Academic record

Programme requirements

Course scope
Learning outcomes
Recognition criteria

Different institutions.
A question of equivalence.

Conceptual illustrations, not product screenshots or academic decisions.

From academic work to useful tools.

Three strands of PeerMind

PaperGrade

Available

Your criteria.
Your assessment.

Prepare exams, calibrate rubrics, and review digital student submissions with AI score proposals. A workspace built around the instructor’s review.

Open PaperGrade

  1. Prepare the standard

    Define the questions, rubric, and criteria before reviewing submissions.

  2. Calibrate with examples

    Use reference answers and scored examples to make the standard explicit.

  3. Review the proposal

    Examine AI score proposals against your criteria and the source material.

A score proposal is not a final grade.The academic judgment stays with you.

Librarian

In development

Research that
stays connected.

SourcesRelated workYour project

A connected library, not another pile of papers.

A research library in development for papers, their evidence-based relationships, and the questions they inform. Keep the context of your reading alongside the sources.

Keep the source
One shared record, rather than copies scattered across projects.
Follow the connection
Relationships grounded in what the papers actually say.
Return to the question
Reading connected to the work you are trying to do.
Explore Librarian’s direction

The starting point is academic papers: preserving sources, tracing evidence-based relationships, and recording why a paper matters to a project. Librarian is in development; there is no public application linked here.

Credit transfer

Research project

Learning
should travel.

Research into automatic academic credit transfer. Exploring how prior learning meets the requirements of a different programme, without losing the context of either institution.

Explore the research

This strand of PeerMind’s work includes an authored academic paper. The question is how course scope, learning outcomes, and academic records can inform a comparison with programme requirements.

A question of equivalenceIllustrative comparison

Prior study

  • Course scope
  • Learning outcomes
  • Academic record

New programme

  • Course scope
  • Learning outcomes
  • Recognition criteria

What carries across?
What needs a closer look?

A research question, not an automated recognition decision.

Where minds
meet peers.

A useful second perspective.
Not a substitute for yours.

PeerMind is a growing academic venture for the people who teach, investigate, and evaluate. Different tools, held together by one idea: another perspective should strengthen academic work without taking it out of your hands.